The teacher says there is no point engaging a student because they would fail anyway. The teacher's response shows that they do not agree with which educational philosophy?

The teacher says there is no point engaging a student because they would fail anyway. The teacher's response shows that they do not agree with which educational philosophy?

• A. All students can learn.
• B. Individual differences matter.
• C. Learning depends solely on test scores.
• D. Education should be standardized.

Answer: (A)

At the heart of this item is the belief about every learner’s potential. Saying there’s no point engaging a student because they would fail anyway shows a fixed, defeatist view that some students cannot learn. That stance contradicts the idea that all students can learn with the right supports and effort, which is why this option is the best fit. Other ideas aren’t as directly challenged by the statement. Valuing individual differences would support tailoring instruction to each learner, which the remark ignores but doesn’t articulate. Thinking that learning hinges only on test scores or that education should be standardized shifts the focus to outcomes or methods rather than universal potential, so they don’t capture the core clash as clearly.

At the heart of this item is the belief about every learner’s potential. Saying there’s no point engaging a student because they would fail anyway shows a fixed, defeatist view that some students cannot learn. That stance contradicts the idea that all students can learn with the right supports and effort, which is why this option is the best fit.

Other ideas aren’t as directly challenged by the statement. Valuing individual differences would support tailoring instruction to each learner, which the remark ignores but doesn’t articulate. Thinking that learning hinges only on test scores or that education should be standardized shifts the focus to outcomes or methods rather than universal potential, so they don’t capture the core clash as clearly.